The company is the mighty gatekeeper of the world wide web’s accumulating treasure, serving as the portal through which hundreds of billions of searches for knowledge are conducted every day. The internal logic of Google Search has historically remained a mystery, as have the subtleties involved in attaining online visibility, where search-engine optimisers (SEOs) and webmasters alike have tried to reverse-engineer the formula — but one incident might just have blown the lid off of the closely guarded vaults of Googlerexia, and have revealed what appears to be the main ingredients of the web’s greatest secret sauce.
There’s been a startling claim that tens of thousands of pages of commentary about how Google’s Search algorithm works ended up posted on a publicly accessible website in the past week or so. It threatened to end Google’s narrative about how it ranks pages once and for all. The story was big news, with tech blogs going into overdrive. But almost as soon from it broke, Google came out to clarify what had happened – trying to put the cat that was spiritedly mewling about these 10,000-word pages into the bag. Except that cat was Google’s and not ours. There was a lot at stake here, and it’s an issue that’s relevant to us all. It’s about understanding how Google ranks pages.
Figuring out how search works within Google means figuring out how the universe works digitally. When we make a query to Google and type in our search, there’s a secret cadence, dance and logic that happens behind the scenes every second of every day that no one really knows. It’s called crawling, indexing and ranking and they are all happening at the same time, on the same page, and the outcome can make or break a company or website. This is the Search Engine Results Page (SERP), and it’s the most valuable digital real estate in the world.
It’s no exaggeration to say that Google is the most powerful search engine in the world. Getting a top ranking in Google’s search results can massively increase a website’s online visibility: it attracts more traffic, which means it earns more money, so having such a high profile is a major goal for many sites. That Google’s prominence inspires such striving underlines the fact that, while companies that rely on Google searches for finding potential customers must try to make sure that their products rank highly, nobody else knows the precise criteria Google uses.
The hunt for Google’s algorithm is a digital arms race, not an academic pursuit. The leaked documents suggest there’s a discrepancy between what Google told us and what they show in their system: it turns out that domain authority, user interaction data and content newness are even more important than Google has led us to believe in the past.
This tension between what Google represents in their publicly published guidelines and what is actually happening, as revealed in the leaked documents, raises questions about what the search engine’s ranking practices are hiding and what they would means for the integrity of Google as a business and an online aid for information search. Google encourages folks to create content for people first, and evaluative content second. Meanwhile, the leaked knowledge tells us that Google is also likely using a range of other factors to judge how visible a search result should be. It’s increasingly unclear to folk who want to succeed in search which is the ‘path to power’. And for those trying to improve search, understanding what ‘good, people-first content… evaluative content… other stuff’ actually means is crucial to continuing to maintain trust in the quality of Google content.
The unveiling of potentially sensitive data on Google’s Search algorithm is just one of the impacts that have been set in motion. SEOs who are poring over internal documents, trying to glean something actionable from the leak, might switch up their strategy to attempt to better match whatever Google’s now-secret preferences might be on organising the internet. In the coming weeks and months, the search algorithm might just shift in ways that make sites more clever and manipulative as a consequence. In the meantime, Google dodged all the questions I had, offering only an official statement about the leak, and noting that the data is incomplete and old.
From the humble beginnings of Larry Page and Sergey Brin’s graduate research project – a simple search engine – Google has grown into a diverse global megacorporation that covers everything from advertising to consumer goods to cutting-edge technologies. Google went public in 2004, and though the company has weathered its fair share of scandals and controversies, its initial mission to ‘organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful’ has become the guiding principle behind the modern internet. Even as Google stumbles, it continues to innovate, learning from its mistakes and embodying the best spirit of Silicon Valley’s pursuit of digital perfection.
So, in conclusion, the leak might be accurate or it might be a smoke-and-mirrors operation, but it does reveal for anyone paying attention that Google’s ranking is part science and part art, part true and part made-up, akin to the myths surrounding alchemy. It should also make it clear that digital strategies are always evolving as the landscape shifts beneath our feet and toes. Whatever the current status of all this, as the conversation continues, the digital village will look on in anticipation to see how the landscape changes and what impact the leak will have on the practice of SEO and content creation going forward.
© 2024 UC Technology Inc . All Rights Reserved.