In the whirlwind evolution of our fast-changing, electrified and automated universe of mobility where vehicles and technologies are driving us at an ever-faster, and publicly more controversial, pace, the need to document every detail, every uptake and every failure, is – if anything – greater than ever. Cameras, both in the physical and figurative sense, help us with perspectives, and should be appreciated and cherished as such.
Cameras – both figurative and literal – are poring in on an automotive moment: Tesla shareholders ratifying a $56 billion compensation package for its visionary leader, Elon Musk. The outcome might determine not only the future of one of the most innovative companies of our time, but the form of transportation for the rest of us in the decades to come. It’s as juicy a setup as an episode of Mad Men or the boardroom drama Wall Street: a showdown between corporate governance and innovation, visionary leadership and experiential design.
But the story of Musk’s reward is not just about numbers. It is a story of influence. It is a story of ambition. It is a story of the ability of visionary thinking to alter reality. It is a story of the certainty that innovation brings value in a world that often does not seem to prioritise that path. It is a story that cameras – the ones pointed at journalists and analysts and enthusiasts alike – are focused on capturing.
Tesla may be grabbing the headlines for the wide-angle shots but other players in the car industry, such as Ford, are shifting quietly into the positions in front of the opposition. Such stories come out of the industry through an insider lens: the news that Ford has been doing the transfer windows, poaching people from rivals and tech giants, to give them an edge. Palmer reports diligently on the research and network of industry knowledge and the moves being made to drive the future of mobility.
Here, cameras tell a different kind of story: one of perseverance, of resilience, of the challenges inherent in building a viable, practical mode of future transportation. The high price tag on General Motors’ investment in its robotaxi subsidiary Cruise reveals the risk and effort of building the first tonne of this brave new world. Investors and analysts provide a financial corollary to the realities of autonomy.
Despite this, innovation narratives in mobility aren’t just big players. Cameras also zoom in on up-and-coming startups and technologies seen as disruptive – for example AI-based positioning or the public offering of electric bikes. These stories, often hosted in tech pages of digital media outlets, provide readers with a view of a diverse and evolving landscape, allowing them to see how potentially industry-altering companies and technologies have come to fruition.
Not all camera-lens moments of a car company’s rise and fall are about unbridled success. Even Fisker and Rivian, once arch-rivals battling for dominance and now battling for survival, suffered humiliating recalls in the weeks before Christmas. Every time a trim or a feature implodes or a price tag gets pulled from the market, it’s the fickle caprice of frame and footage. But what’s more real than the camera’s eye? I want not only the magic and the bright lights but the ugly instances of things going wrong, too. Press releases and investigative journalism – that is how we must contextualise the archive of every innovating company on the way to mass-market viability.
To end our story-based tour of the mobility industry’s latest developments, I’d like to remind you of the importance of cameras – literal and figurative – in offering a view of what’s going on. I’ve been writing about this industry since 1986, and I’ve been privileged to see what goes on in boardrooms as they battle over whether the CEO’s pay package should be $1 million or $10 million. And in engineering labs as they refine the next best electric car.
© 2024 UC Technology Inc . All Rights Reserved.