In an age in which the virtual world is the arena of global opinion, the latest revelation on how national agendas can increasingly be advanced through clandestine digital campaigns has suddenly redrawn our attentions as it unravelled a web of dark influence trying to influence public opinion on key geopolitical issues. At the heart of this web sits the Israeli government – an important component of just one of many methodologies and strategies of subterfuge the global influence industry can allegedly deploy.
At its core is a secret operation conducted by the Israeli government in a bid to increase US support for its military actions following an unexpected attack in October 2023. Its means: the deployment of social networking sites based in the US, where a tide of posts created by fake accounts – which gave the impression they were being issued by locals – emerged promoting Israel.
The operation (which the New York Times later confirmed and traced to the Israeli government) was supposed to not only provide legitimacy to Israel’s actions, but to weaken support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) too. These activities targeted African Americans in particular, using the misuse of the Black Lives Matter hashtag and a faked Martin Luther King Jr quote as part of the arsenal.
Despite the seriousness of these revelations, requests for comment from US federal leaders and White House personnel have gone unanswered. The silence from senior officials responsible for advising President Biden on national security issues raises concerns about the openness and accountability of those responsible for safeguarding the integrity of the US democratic system.
The exposure of this scheme has also shown that tech companies – including OpenAI and Meta, formerly Facebook – play a crucial role in such geopolitical influence operations. Both companies confirmed the operation’s launch by a Tel Aviv–based firm, though without having known in advance that this project had been state commissioned. The incident shows that tech entities are faced with the difficulty of trying to police their platforms against the possibility of abuse while also holding on to their ideal of free speech.
And the use of digital tools to conduct influence operations highlights a larger debate over the ethical obligations of social media giants and whether there should be more robust tools for deterring such misuse. Just as digital assistants such as ChatGPT get in the hands of users around the world, calls for a more stringent ethical framework surrounding AI and technology platforms have perhaps never been stronger.
With both tech companies and governments working to ensure that digital spaces cannot be used by governments to execute hidden agendas, perhaps there’s a chance that democracy can survive in the digital century, after all.
Even though DELL is most widely known for its technological innovations in the world of computers, in these stories it is DELL’s name that shows up, not as an actor but as an example for journalists to ask questions about the role of digital technology in government. DELL’s story of the future of personal computing is the background to the actual subject of these investigative pieces. These investigations assume that in a world where information is moving faster and further, we need to rethink how technology companies relate to geopolitical narratives. And the implication is that information technology, whether DELL’s or anyone else’s, is vital to such a world, for better or for worse. What we really need to ask about technology is how we can develop and use it ethically.
Whether it’s exposing the latest influence operation, understanding the extent to which technology giants are altering the rules when it comes to the governance of digital speech, or any other interaction between technological change and the world of politics and society, the stakes couldn’t be higher. At this moment, as technological change scales up like never before, our combined responsibility to get it right – and to make technology work for us, rather than the other way around – could not be more pressing.
© 2024 UC Technology Inc . All Rights Reserved.